翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ United States v. Richardson
・ United States v. Riggs
・ United States v. Riverside Bayview
・ United States v. Robel
・ United States v. Robinson
・ United States v. Rodriquez
・ United States v. Rogers
・ United States v. Ross
・ United States v. Russell
・ United States v. Rybar
・ United States v. Salerno
・ United States v. Sandoval
・ United States v. Santa Fe Pacific Railroad Co.
・ United States v. Scheffer
・ United States v. Scheinberg
United States v. Schoon
・ United States v. Schooner Peggy
・ United States v. Schooner Sally
・ United States v. Schwimmer
・ United States v. Screws
・ United States v. Seale
・ United States v. Seeger
・ United States v. Segui
・ United States v. Sells Engineering, Inc.
・ United States v. Shabani
・ United States v. Shi
・ United States v. Shipp
・ United States v. Shoshone Tribe of Indians
・ United States v. Shynkarenko
・ United States v. Simms


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

United States v. Schoon : ウィキペディア英語版
United States v. Schoon

''United States v. Schoon,'' 939 F.2d 826 (1991), was a case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The court's decision centered upon the legal defense of necessity as it relates to acts of civil disobedience and federal criminal charges.
== Background ==

On December 4, 1989, Schoon and approximately thirty people entered the Internal Revenue Service's local office in Tucson, Arizona. They began chanting a demand that U.S. tax dollars not be sent to El Salvador, and threw fake blood throughout the lobby. They were ordered by federal police to disperse or face arrest. The protestors refused to leave, and were subsequently arrested. They were charged with failing to comply with an order of a federal police officer and obstructing government function.
At trial, Schoon offered evidence of the conditions in El Salvador at the time. He argued that his actions in the IRS building were necessary to prevent further violence in El Salvador. The district court refused to admit this evidence, ruling that while Schoon had clearly humanitarian aims, the necessity defense was not applicable to his case.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「United States v. Schoon」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.